When applying design rules in load combination filter, the most frequently used utilization type is ** Steel – Dominant results**. What results are exactly considered by this option and what do corresponding limitations mean?

**Introduction**

There are four ways to apply load combination filter: based on limit states and load cases, manually, and by rules. Unlike the other three methods, **filter by rules is only possible based on analysis and/or design results.**

The most effective way to reduce the number of load combinations is definitely the use of design rules.

With design rules, load combinations can be selected based on utility ratios. Utilizations are available from several design checks, including dominant results and detailed verifications for steel elements, such as general elastic cross-section check, pure resistances, interactions, and global stability.

**The meaning of the dominant check**

The dominant check is not always the check which gives the maximal ratio but the one with the maximum RELEVANT ratio. Typical example: if plastic interaction formulas are valid, those results will be dominant over general elastic cross-section check results, although the latter are higher.

*Steel – Dominant results*

*Steel – Dominant results*

** Steel – Dominant results** option contains the utility ratio of the dominant check at every finite element node, in all load combinations. Meaning that there are as many utilization values as the number of load combinations calculated, in every FE node.

It is also important to understand the difference between the utilizations of ** Maximum of dominant results** and

**.**

*Steel -Dominant results***option contains the dominant utility ratio of the dominant load combination at every node, like an envelope of**

*Maximum of dominant results***. Meaning there is only one utilization value in every FE node. Also, it is the same as the dominant result table on**

*Steel-Dominant results***tab.**

*Global checks*When a rule is applied, the utilizations of the chosen utilization type are compared against the limitation. The load combinations which give the results that correspond to the limitation, are selected by the rule. Every FE node of the selected model portion is examined.

**Limitations in case of ***Steel – Dominant results*

*Steel – Dominant results*

: to select the combinations which cause the maximum utilization at any node. It can be the same as*Maximum*except if there are combinations where the utilization is the same and it is maximal. In this case, here all the combinations are selected, while with*Maximum of dominant results,*, there is always one maximum.*Maximum of dominant results*: to select the combinations as in ’*More than % of maximum*’ plus those which cause utilization that is more than the given percentage of the maximum. E.g. at a certain point max utility ratio is 80%, Limitation= More than 90% of maximum. This rule will select all the load combinations which cause utility ratios between 0,9*80=72% and 80%.*Maximum*: to select the combinations which cause utilization more than the defined value at any point.*More than*

Let’s see an example of a simple 2D frame for better explanation. Right-side beam is in the portion for which three design rules were applied. Five points are selected for representation but of course all the nodes of the portion are examined against the rules’ limitations.

The utilizations of the five dedicated FE node in all 11 load combinations are shown on the below diagram. (To find all of these utilizations in the attached model, global checks must be calculated for the load combinations one-by-one.)

gateConsteel offers a range of load combination filtering options, which can be applied based on limit states, load cases, and analysis and design results. By applying different series of filters, designers can streamline their workflow and reduce calculation time.

**Filtering options**

Filtering is realized through the *Load combination set definition* window.

Filtering by limit states and by load cases are handled together with the checkboxes under the ** Limit states** and

**buttons.**

*Load cases*The 3-state checkboxes affect each other as they are not only used for selection but also for indication of the content. They can be manually set only to checked or unchecked. The middle state only appears when other filters are applied.

Filtering by limit states or load cases does not require any calculation results.

**Filter by rules**, on the other hand,is based on the actual analysis and/or design results. Different types of rules can be applied one by one or at the same time to select the desired load combinations.

When a rule is applied, all the load combinations that are selected on the **Load combination set definition** dialog- either with filtering by limit states/load cases or checked in manually- are examined at every position the rule indicates. Load combinations that meet the rule’s criteria are selected (remain checked in), while those that do not, become unchecked.

- With analysis rules, load combinations can be selected based on deformations or internal forces at either every finite element node or only at the member ends. This last one is included specifically for connection design. Deformations are checked in SLS combinations, internal forces are checked in ULS combinations only.
- With buckling rules, those ULS load combinations can be selected which have the elastic critical load factor (first buckling eigenvalue) less than the given limit.
- With design rules, load combinations can be selected based on utility ratios checked in every finite element node of the chosen portion. Utilizations are available from several design checks: dominant results and detailed verifications for steel elements such as general elastic cross-section check, pure resistances, interactions and global stability. Only ULS combinations can be filtered with design rules.

**Interaction of the different filter types**

Filtering by limit states, load cases, and rules can be used together, with **rules** being **applied only to** **load combinations that are checked in** and have the necessary calculation results.

Let’s see an example.

It is a simple 2D frame model, with 27 load combinations of various limit states generated. Analysis and design results are calculated for all load combinations.

If applying design rule to select only those load combinations which result dominant utilization over 50%,

4 load combinations will be selected (Load combination set 1):

But if ULS Accidental limit state is turned off before applying the same 50% filter,

only one load combination is selected (see Load combination set 2).

**Application of multiple rules**

**Applying multiple rules together** results in the sum of the lists that would have been created separately.

In Consteel 16, we introduced the function of load combination filter. Filtering is possible based on the load combinations’ limit state, load cases, and corresponding analysis and design results. The goal is to create different sets for the different steps of the optimization and reduce calculation time while making sure that all the relevant load combinations are considered. Let’s see what a conscious design workflow looks like in practice!

**Description**

It is a significant problem in almost all structural design projects that the standards define many possible load cases and combinations to evaluate. Although most of these load combinations are never relevant or provide decisive design situations, it is usually not evident which ones might be neglected safely, especially when considering, that different load combinations can be relevant for different parts of the structure, like primary or secondary structure, connections, etc. Accordingly, the optimization process is overloaded by a large amount of unnecessary calculations.

With the load combination filter function, a reduced list of load combinations aka a load combination set can be created and saved for the different steps of the optimization.

The optimal workflow for the filter may vary for the different purposes the sets are created for, but there is a recommended general process that can serve as the basis for all of them. First, run the **simplest calculations** and use the results for a **rough selection** which will already decrease the number of load combinations noticeably. Then one can increase the **complex**ity of the **calculations** and further reduce the list of combinations by using **stricter filters**. If needed, this step can be repeated. This iterative process allows us to avoid complex and time-consuming calculations for all the thousands of load combinations.

*1 – all load combination, no filter;**2 – initial set with broad filter;**3 – working set with strict filter*

**Detailed process**

**Modeling**

The base of all optimization processes is a correctly built structural model. So, the first step is geometrical and structural modeling and load definition. It is advisable to run a first-order analysis for only one or two load cases and diagnostics to find possible modeling errors. Load combinations can be created after that. Every limit state that will be used during the whole design of the structure, should be defined. Consteel’s automatic load combination generation function is an efficient tool to do it.

**Calculation and filter**

On the Load combination set definition dialog, it is possible to create load combination sets by selecting the combinations based on their limit state and/or the load cases they contain. But usually, filtering on specific analysis or design results will likely be more effective in reducing the number of combinations. Using the above-described general workflow, the steps are as follows:

gate