The collection and release of our new developments usually span around a year. These novelties traditionally connected to a subsequent new version of Consteel, our flagship product. However, by now the novelties cover a much wider range of services than just new functions in Consteel. Last year we have published a new website, which is intended to be the centre of several customer services including licensing, learning, support, community building. Also, we have launched Steelspace, our cloud-based platform. All of these developments are created to help the whole range of your workflow and maintain a deeper and more fruitful relationship between you and us. We want to be a real part of your work presenting wider efficiency-increasing possibilities by modern technologies. We strongly think that you should be aware of (and hopefully share) our visions, strategies, and planned development directions so we want you to understand our goals with the novelties. In the following, we would like to share a couple of specific goals and directions and summarize the efforts we made to move forward with our new developments.

Serving your efficiency

Goal: To share all supplementary services for your work in one place

We believe that sharing our core values with you can help substantially your work. So we will provide a place where you can easily access our structured knowledge and experience in structural analysis, standard design methods, and the recent modern technologies of the construction industry: this is our new Service Center. It will include our extended User Manual in a new online form with easy navigation between the topics. In the Knowledge Base, we collect all learning materials and models of different types and levels to help your understanding of how to develop an effective design workflow in Consteel. In the Script Library, we share several prepared script examples which are ready to go in your Consteel and show the best practices in the use of scripting interfaces.

Stay up-to-date with us

Goal: To develop and maintain better communication with you

We want to level up the connection and communication between you and us. We want to make sure that all the personally relevant information reaches you in time, be it new content in our brand new Knowledge Base, software update info, or an upcoming event. From now on we can inform you not only by newsletters or website but directly through Consteel on a new Open dialogue. In this window, we will share all updates and you can quickly access our webpage, Knowledge base, or blog for more information. This information channel will even be personalized so as not to bother you with uninteresting topics but to provide the most relevant and fresh ones to you.

Control your license

Goal: To provide a transparent and flexible licensing system in your hand

We see that there are varying demands of the different types of companies when it comes to licensing; from single to group, from hardkey to online, from lifelong to temporary. So we are working on a flexible licensing system covering all your needs which will give the control into your hands. You can always check your actual status and change your settings easily either in Consteel or in your personal account on our website. With this new tool, we also prepared for further licensing options dominated by periodic subscriptions. In the end, you can always choose your most convenient type of licensing from a great variety of options and settings.

Go online

Goal: To get you to utilize our supplementary cloud services

Cloud solutions can open a new dimension in several services. So we want you to move outside from your computer. As a first step, we make it easy to save and store your models and results in the cloud in your personal Steelspace account. With the new cloud-save and cloud-open possibilities you do not even have to open your web browser, you just use these functions as if your personal cloud storage was on your desktop. Your cloud-saved models will accumulate in this store and you can quickly view, access, and open them directly from Consteel. Steelspace, your cloud service platform, will provide your models the storing, sharing, and commenting options. Additionally, all the forthcoming services implemented in Steelspace will be conveniently accessible for you.

Easy scripting

Goal: To promote and support the scripting possibilities as the most progressive ways of efficient modelling and execution manipulation

Scripting is a powerful tool in your hand to create, access, and manipulate flexibly model objects and operations or calculations on them. We know it is not always easy or familiar to the structural engineers, so want to bring the power of scripting closer to you. The Consteel Programming Interfaces cover multilevel scripting options: visual scripting in Grasshopper with the Pangolin plugin, internal scripting with our own Descript environment, and external scripting by our new .NET API. These choices conform with different levels of programming skills and you can easily find the one that suits you. Moreover, the new Service Center will provide you a Script Library with a couple of useful script examples at all levels with various purposes. The easy access and execution of your scripts – either on your desktop or in the cloud – are supported by the new MyScripts environment.

Informative visualization

Goal: to provide a graphical environment with a high level of information transfer

Model and result visualization is essential for a good engineer. It is well known that good visualization helps and speeds up the better understanding and correct interpretation of any data model compared to texts or tables. The quick and correct understanding definitely leads to more efficient work. So we want to support your efficiency with some really useful new visualization options for the structural model and analysis results. In the modelling phase, you will able to switch to a new model view where the members get colours from their cross-section type. We also introduce several immersive result visualization in the global model view as well as in the cross-section level.


Goal: A revolutionary representation of structural members with detailed modelling and dual analysis options

We have taken a big step forward again in steel structural member modelling and analysis. Steel beams and columns are the most frequently used model objects in the design workflow although these can be very different in terms of shapes, details, behaviour and connected analysis and design needs. In our new superbeam concept, you can keep the easy and quick modelling of these elements extended by several new adaptive detailing features (holes, stiffeners etc.) while the analysis can be performed on two consistently generated calculation models. The beam FE model has well-known analysis and design capabilities now including some of the detailing options in the structural behaviour. The second option is a shell FE model for the member consistently connected into the global beam FE model and including the additional holes and stiffeners in the mesh. You can easily switch between the analysis options since the whole process is fully adaptive. You model and modify simple bar members and calculate the consistent beam or shell FE model.

We asked Eszter Arendt, the winner of the Hungarian Consteel Diploma Contest 2020, to write a summary of her diploma thesis on the Consteel blog, and we asked a few questions about her experience throughout the project.

Parametric Analysis of Freeform Steel Grid Structure

In my diploma thesis I re-designed the roof structure of the Arrival Hall of Hungexpo Budapest Fair Centre.

The propeller-shaped building’s enclosing size is ca. 72,0 * 67,0 metres. The facade of the building is a steel grid structure. The roof structure of the building is a steel space grid connected to the facade support structure.

The roof is supported by the steel space grid on its edges and a reinforced concrete ring in the centre. The glass structure in the middle and the walk-through mechanical yard both load on the RC ring, therefore the middle section doesn’t influence the resistance of the rest of the roof. The roof structure fits on a spherical shape.

1. figure Visual design of Hungexpo’s new Arrival Hall (fintastudio.hu)

Since this is a freeform structure, I used Grasshopper for the design, a software backed with a solid mathematical background that allows you to easily create even more complex geometric shapes. In addition, it has the great advantage of allowing parametric design, therefore many different designs and possibilities can be examined within it.

In my dissertation, I examined two types of layout: ribbed and triangular grid. Both grid systems had 4-4 subtypes that differed in their spacing ranges. I designed the different subtypes based on aspects of manufacturing, installation and transport. During the conceptual design, I examined and evaluated these 8 layouts seeking the most favourable solution among them.

2. Figure Examined ribbed grid structure designs
3.Figure Examined triangular grid structure designs

Calculations were executed in Consteel, which has a direct connection to Grasshopper through Pangolin, so I could build the static model completely parametrically.

The geometry which I created in Grasshopper is based on space curves. However, analysis software typically deals with fewer geometry options, therefore I redesigned the model to make the elements manageable in Consteel.

4. Figure Convert curves to polygons

The goal of the conceptional design was to build a model which can be examined and compared quickly and easily, therefore I only applied one ULS and one SLS maximum load combination. With the help of the parametric model and Pangolin, I could create models in a way that while switching between parameters my Consteel model changed along, so multiple combination options could be examined easily. Apparently, I noticed both in the case of the triangle and the ribbed design, that the sections were utilized up to a certain spacing range, but at too large spacing the deflection became dominant, so the structure was no longer economical in terms of material consumption.

I selected the most favourable design with the help of a decision support option matrix. The great advantage of the decision support matrix is that the different designs are clearly comparable in many aspects. The evaluation was colour-coded. The criteria of the decision support option matrix were as follows:



Manufacture and assembly


I colour-coded the different viewpionts

Based on the evaluation the ribbed structure was proved to be best, so I carried one of the ribbed designs further for detailed calculations.

5.Figure Decision support option matrix

During the detailed calculation, I could apply the loads more precisely on the structure along with load combinations. Most loads acted as surface loads on the entire roof, but the wind was of different magnitudes in different zones. Here, the parametric model also had a great advantage, as being a freeform structure, I applied the wind load from 6 different directions and defined the wind zones parametrically, so changing the wind direction also changed the zones, therefore I didn’t have to define different loads on the load panels.

6.Figure Examined wind directions
7.Figure Adopting wind zones

I also dealt with the configuration and design of the connections, for which I did calculations manually and with csJoint. It was quite instructive for me to see how much the connections influenced the main structural response. Already in conceptual design, when choosing a beam layout and defining beam end releases, it is important to consider whether connections can be designed in a way that provides adequate stiffness.

8.Figure Examined construction condition

Overall, I learned a lot about design processes and parametric design during my dissertation. I think there will be an increasing emphasis on parametric design in the future, so it’s definitely worth addressing this topic.

We asked a few questions from the author, Eszter Arendt, about her experiences she gained during the project.


Consteel: First of all, congratulations on your diploma and winning the Hungarian Consteel Diploma Contest! How did you decide on the subject of your diploma?

Eszter: I was introduced to parametric design in a class held by a guest professor, and I decided right there, that I want to write in my diploma about this subject. I was lucky that bim.GROUP had already had a project which used parametric design, to which I could join, so it came naturally that I’ll write my diploma about the Hungexpo Arrival Hall. I joined the team at about halfway through the project and I worked until the end.

Consteel: What was your role in the project?

Eszter: I worked on the secondary structures mostly. The cladding was supported by a specially shaped curved profile that followed the line of the building everywhere, so these were unique profiles. I was responsible for the statics and design of this. I also helped where I needed to do connection calculations and in the design of the glass dome on the roof.

Consteel: How can a student imagine working on a project like this?

Eszter: It is full of challenges for sure. As a novice engineer, I think, you can learn a lot on any project, but for such a complex one, it was especially true in this case.

Consteel: What did you like most in this particular project?

Eszter: I liked that this was a unique project, therefore it was not boring at all, and I especially enjoyed the whole parametric design.

Consteel: What did you consider the biggest challenge in either your responsibility or in the project itself?

Eszter: The time. The construction industry is very accelerated, often with very tight deadlines. It’s challenging to get a really good job out of our hands that way. I think it’s even harder as a novice engineer, as we don’t have many years of experience, so every new task is also a learning experience.

Consteel: What Consteel function did you use most? Which part did it help your work mostly?

Eszter: I performed all the main static calculations in Consteel. Already in conceptual design, it was quite useful that I could compare different designs with simple models. I like that the stresses for connection calculations can be obtained easily and transparently. Besides, I used csJoint for the connection calculations.

Eszter: I think it has multiple advantages, but I would highlight three things:

I don’t know how I would have solved the transfer without Pangolin, maybe I would have transferred a line skeleton, but even then I would have had to build the models one by one. I think Pangolin is essential for freeform structures, but it can also be very useful for simpler tasks.

Project Facts

Eszter Arendt’s Msc diploma thesis


Márton István Juhász – bim.GROUP Kft.
Nauzika Kovács PhD – Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Structural Engineering

Last week, on the 4th and 5th of February we held our usual yearly meeting with our resellers. It was the 10th time the Consteel Distributors got together – except this was the first time it happened online.

Usually, the distributors visit the Consteel office in Budapest on the annual distributor meetings. But this year there are no journey experiences to share, snacking on the sweet treats that a kind partner usually brings from his homeland for the team, no handshakes or getting together at all. Instead, everyone logged in from their offices, or their own homes to join the meeting. Distributors from Germany, Greece, Poland, Romania and Spain joined us to share sales experiences from 2020 and share and find out more about the plans for Consteel developments in 2021.

On the first morning, each distributor gave a presentation, summarizing last year’s events in a nutshell, and sharing their experiences in 2020 in terms of sales. We could also learn about each other’s experiences of the pandemic, in terms of business. We all had one thing in common: we had almost the same events and circumstances, for shorter or longer periods, such as social distancing, lockdowns, working from home and wearing masks everywhere. After our lunch break, we played a little online game, where everybody could show off their drawing skills on their desktop with a mouse.

The highlight of the day was the announcement of the Consteel Distributor of the Year 2020. The winner of the award this time was Strenco, our distributor in Poland. We warmly congratulate to the winner, Mr Adam Machowiak, for his great work and efforts in 2020, and wish him just as great success in the upcoming year. Sadly, we could not hand him his prize in person, so we had to do a little trick to deliver the winner his trophy. Here you can see a short video of how our “ceremony” turned out.

Distributor of the Year 2020: Strenco

Our next program was a sales and marketing afternoon when we discussed some new ideas and plans for our sales activities for this new year. The following session was the introduction and preparation for the next morning’s workshop.
Friday started with the workshop: each participant had to use all their creativity. The partners could all share their opinions and brainstorm a bit about future sales possibilities.

This day could not pass without some fun after lunch either – even though we could not have our usual team building this year some more colleagues could play with us from the partner offices, which was nice. Next, it was time to introduce the new developments of Consteel 15 – which we cannot tell more about just yet, but we can assure you that we are looking ahead an exceptional year.

After a short discussion about our communications, came our last event of the distributor meeting: the traditional “Meet the Team” session. The distributor team and the Consteel team turned on their cameras and waved our “Hello” -s to each other

“Meet the Team” at Consteel Distributor Meeting 2021

Our 10th Consteel Distributor Meeting turned out just as great as any other. However, we hope that next year we can greet each other face to face again.

The Hungexpo Budapest Fair is going through a massive revitalization. This project includes the new Arrival Hall Building, an attractive propeller-shaped building. A building with such geometric complexity requires advanced design methods and multi-platform collaboration. In this article, we aim to give an insight into the open BIM environment and parametric design methods used in the design process. 

HUNGEXPO F1-Fogadóépület - FintaStudio
1. Figure: The New Arrival Hall Building (Hungexpo F1) – fintastudio.hu 

BIM Design Ltd. had various design tasks on the revitalization projects, this article will focus only on the steel design roles of Arrival Hall Building, fabrication and construction optimization, detail and erection design of the steel structure. 

The design workflow is centred Rhino/Grasshopper, the centerline geometry is controlled here. This allows wireframe identical conceptual, structural calculations and shop detailing models. The Consteel is used for design and it is connected to Grasshopper with real-time plugins, the models are generated via visual scripting. All changes in the centerline geometry can be executed to all the models by re-running the scripts. This allows fast, detailed and multi-concept investigations through which we can improve the structure. 


The building envelope is 120° rotationally symmetric, on top view forming 3 identical wings, resulting in a shape of a propeller. The roof surface is laid on a perfect sphere. This sphere has a circular hole in the centre and cut around with a propeller shape perimeter in the outside. The main facade is built up of 3 undulating stripes with distinct edges. These edges are horizontal on the lower levels and spatial on the roof edge, but all are ordinary curves with constantly changing curvature. 

2. Figure: Architectural building envelope 

The structure can be divided into 3 parts: the facade structure, the roof structure and the secondary wall purlins. The facade is a multi-level steel truss with roughly 4-5 m wide triangle units. All steel elements are circular hollow sections. The horizontal elements follow the facade surface curvature, the inclined columns (diagonals) are straight. The roof is made of radial and circumferential elements with diagonal bracing. The radial elements are curved among the sphere surface, the circumferential elements in-between are straight beams. The wall purlins stand in a defined vertical plane harmonized with the external cladding layout. 

The building’s inner core, the concrete substructure does not keep the rotational symmetry, all 3 wings of the propeller show a different geometry. The load-bearing hierarchy is mixed, in some parts the steel structure supports the perimeter of concrete slabs while in other parts the concrete core supports the steel structure. 

3. Figure: Reinforced-concrete loadbearing system 

A spatial and complex building without proper control of geometry is unlikely to result in identical assemblies. Standardization is a key element in the entire construction process, it’s beneficial to reduce the number of unique assemblies. Data transfer from one software to another, the orientation of elements, local coordinate systems, varying geometric precision setups all add to this inaccuracy. 

The building’s peculiarity, the 120° rotationally symmetry stays true for most of the steel structure. This property if used properly can reduce the number of unique assemblies to a third. As a base step, the received centerline geometry was corrected to fulfil this property, resulting in perfectly rotationally symmetric geometry to the fraction of a µm. 

4. Figure: The corrected, rotationally symmetric centerline geometry in Rhino. 


All construction elements must be divided into some size to deliver it to the construction site.  The facade’s main unit size of the structure is a 4 m triangle, unluckily, it is not the most suitable for well-utilized standard road delivery. Three different segmentation strategy has been investigated using parametric grouping of elements. These concepts cover solutions from the smallest assemblies (joints and beams) to 5 m by 20 m curved spatial trusses. All 3 concepts have been analyzed in collaboration with the contracted manufacturer and the erector, as a result, a mixture of joints and beams, and smaller trusses were selected for detail design with trusses of maximum 2m in height at the entrances.

5. Figure: Facade structure segmentation investigations. Different colours represent separate fabrication assemblies. 

The roof structure has been investigated in the same way, but as a result, all elements were reduced to beams, without forming any trusses. 

6. Figure: Rejected welded roof truss concepts

These parametric investigations require moderate design effort at an early stage of the project but influence significant costs and time in procurement, fabrication, fabrication logistics, delivery, site requirements, lifting and so on. These questions can be better understood and decided through with the aid of these concept models. 

Given the delivery segmentation, another crucial task was to rationalize the ordinary curved girders while maintaining the structure visually appealing. The curves have been divided into straight and planar arc segments. Arced segments are cut perpendicular to the centerline, the resulting angle difference is always cut on the straight segments. This improves the geometric accuracy of manufacturing. 

The constructor required to reduce welding on site to a minimum, therefore bolted joints were selected for most of the site connections. The bolted connections were standardized for every cross-section, to allow continuous pre-production of identical parts on the manufacturers assembling and welding robot. As a result, more than 2000 of connection sub-assemblies were manufactured with only 7 distinct splice types.

7. Figure: Standardized bolted joints of facade.

The roof structures standardization originates in the spherical roof geometry, the upper half of the radial beams, circumferential beams on a given circle are identical because centerline geometry is identical, the only condition was to keep these elements’ connection parts identical. 


After the model was segmented to fabrication assemblies, the curved elements were rationalized to actual production parts, the next step was to check structural behaviour and section sizes. For this Consteel software was used linked to Grasshopper via the Pangolin plugin. The interface allows a real-time link between the Grasshopper script and the Consteel structural model. Receiving data back from calculation results is in development right now, however, previously created Consteel models can already be referenced in the Grasshopper script. The interface can generate almost all available Consteel objects: geometry, materials, cross-sections, structural elements, supports, loads, load groups. 

8. Figure: Feature-rich Pangolin toolbar for Grasshopper 

The components can project the FE model in Rhino viewport similarly as it appears in Consteel, which gives constant feedback of the Grasshopper script writing. The script generates the Consteel model, the structural calculations run inside Consteel with all functionality. 

9. Figure: Rhino model – Grasshopper script – Consteel model simultaneously 

The wind coefficients of the structure were not self-evident since physical wind tunnel test was not available, and the standard does not define coefficients for such shape. As a result for the wall the coefficients we defined to be windward, leeward or sideward zones depending on the angle of the load panel’s normal vector and the wind vector. We divided the angle range two 4 equal segments. The calculated angle is between 315°-45° for the windward zone, 45°-135° and 225°-315° for side walls zone, 135°-225° for the leeward zone. The roof was considered as a double pitched roof, with intense zones on the roof edges. We investigated different 12 wind directions, 30° angles from each other, but later reduced it to 6 major wind directions which are somewhat parallel or perpendicular to the majority of the facade. 

10. Figure: Sample wind load case – wind coefficient distribution in Rhino and the exported structural load model in Consteel 

The structural analysis and standard checks are automatically performed in Consteel for the strength, stability, seismic and serviceability limit states using directly the model received from Pangolin, which resulted in a very efficient structural design workflow. All the structural elements were exported to Consteel including the steel and the concrete parts with all supports and loads, the analysis considered the complete model and the design checks considered only the steel members. 

11. Figure: The complete structural model for analysis and the steel part for design in Consteel 

The unique analysis and cross-section models of Consteel allows the automatic calculation and check of all possible internal forces and moments, including the out-of-plane bending and torsion which caused considerable bending and warping stresses along the peripheric beams of the internal circle. 

12. Figure: The complete structural model for analysis and the steel part for design in Consteel 

The buckling check of the members for any possible buckling mode was performed by the fully automatic unique method of Consteel based on the “General method” of 6.3.4 in EN1993-1-1 and the refined global linear buckling analysis. In this methodology, the proper member slenderness values are automatically determined by a special buckling sensitivity analysis which selects the critical members for all the relevant buckling modes. 

13. Figure: A typical global buckling mode and the automatically selected critical members for one load combinations based on the sensitivity analysis

Joint calculations have been performed in IDEA StatiCa. Similar joints were grouped and named systematically already in Grasshopper. These attributes were used for filtering governing forces and geometric extremities for each joint type. The software is linked both to Consteel and Tekla Structures, the interface transfers all necessary geometric, material, and loading data required for the joint design. 

14. Figure: IDEA StatiCa shell models for joint calculations. 


For steel shop detailing Tekla Structures 2019 was used. Tekla Structures is as well linked to Grasshopper, via the Tekla Live Link plugin. As of today, complete Tekla models can be generated via scripting, including all necessary fabrication attributes: sections, materially, welds, weld preparation, bolts, fabrication phase grouping etc. In our case, the Tekla model was approximately 95% generated via Grasshopper script.  

This method allowed deep and iterative investigations to achieve fabrication cost efficiency and best geometric accuracy with moderate extra time and costs in design. 

After the final Tekla model generation, 2d drawings and necessary fabrication documentation were prepared inside Tekla. 


Fabrication accuracy was a key element. In an early-stage test bending of pipes and “I” beams were performed to assess the accuracy of bent elements. It did not result in bigger discrepancy than the fabrication inaccuracy of the cross-section. String height discrepancy is under ±5 mm, length tolerance is within the normal straight element limits. 

As the segmentation and detail design progressed prototype assemblies were also manufactured to investigate the accuracy of assembling. One of each major assembly types were manufactured and measured with 3d geodesic methods. The measured data was aligned on the design model with the best fit, at the connecting parts the discrepancies were calculated. In the end, the manufacturer decided to use this method not just for checking, but also to adjust assemblies prior to final welding.  

15. Figure: Manufacturing accuracy of an assembly based on 3d geodesy measurements 

The erector has performed a trial assembly of a bigger part of the facade to prove assembling compatibility. The strongest curved part of the facade was selected and assembled in a horizontal position. The structure was measured afterwards, the trial assembly showed no alerting inaccuracy. 

The manufacturers’ assembly measurement values were systemized and referenced back to Grasshopper, which allowed pre-evaluation of each unique coherent joints. This data was visualized in 3d on the Tekla BIM model, which is used for predetermination of fitting plates during assembling. 

16. Figure: Manufacturing accuracy of an assembly based on 3d geodesy measurements 

Currently, the site assembly of the steel structure is in progress. It’s planned to perform a full 3d site scan of the assembled steel structure. This measurement data will be used to adjust the secondary purlin system to all manufacturing and erection inaccuracies. Uniquely manufactured cantilevers will be welded on site which will support the cladding system. 

17. Figure: Secondary purlin system of facade 


Architect: Finta és Társai Építész Stúdió Ltd. 

Structural Designer: Hydrastat Ltd. 

Steel Detail Designer: BIM Design Ltd. 

Steel Manufacturer: KÉSZ Ipari Gyártó Ltd. 

Steel Erector: KÉSZ Metaltech Ltd. 

Steel design team: 1 full time lead structural engineer, 2 part-time graduate engineers, 1 full-time modeller, 9 months. 2700m2, 750 tons of steel, 2000 pcs of joints on the facade, 800 pcs wall purlins.